Oh wow 🤯

1st. The lens on his camera is not flat, it is curved, so it bends the light (the image) into the center where the receptors are for greater clarity and more possible distance focus. Because of this, when things are not in focus, we get a fuzzier and fuzzier image that gets dominated by what is in focus. So, the image of the bottle cap--as it gets further out of focus--begins to get dominated by the tabletop, which is in focus. And, when you adjust the focus to the bottle cap, we see it clearly again, and all of it. 2nd. The sailboat was not very far away, not far enough to go 'hull-down'--so when you focus up on it, the image gains clarity, and you see it all again. If it had been far enough away to be 'hull-down' (these are nautical terms used for hundreds of years), no amount of focus would have shown the hull of the boat, as seen in the image I posted on the other thread. 3rd The sun WAS making an arc. And where it arcs in the sky changes depending where on the globe you are and what season it is. It can go directly overhead going E to W, while near the poles away from the sun w/ axil tilt, like Alaska, there are three months of the year when it never sets, it just goes around near the horizon--which is what you would expect being on a globe. And it starts with each of us.

The ones who crack me up the most are the ones who insist that we're all living in some sort of 'simulation' and then at the same time insist that the (X) must be the same for everyone involved and participating in the simulation. That's not how simulations work at all. The data sets for each participant can be changed if the programmer or operator has the ability to do so. That said, we've been lied to about so much for so long, nobody really knows the full truth about anything at this point. I welcome and praise any attempt to distill the truth and dispel the fabricated nonsense that is 'the science' with which the propagators of the same are determined to harm us. "The truth will set you free" - Jesus