Unfortunately, they sound like idiots.: "The CO2 emitted by aircraft only causes about half the climate impact of aviation. The other half comes from contrails— artificial clouds that are created by soot in the engine exhaust." Count the errors! First, CO2 doesn't impact the climate. CO2 levels FOLLOW climate changes, not the other way around. Second, the more CO2, the better! It's the gas of life! Fighting the gas of life is fighting life! Second, they don't even seem to be aware of the difference between a chemtrail and a contrail; they seem completely clueless.

"In certain conditions, aircraft will leave contrails that linger for hours and turn into artificial cirrus clouds." No--that's a CHEMTRAIL, you nitwits. Contrails do NOT become cirrus clouds. Ever.

So the way their imagery works, that I can tell, is that they are taking flight route data and plugging that into current weather conditions and projecting where along those routes the conditions are favorable for contrails creation. They have no awareness of chemtrails, and do not track those at all. So, to put it another way, they are projecting predicted portions of routes that may have conditions favorable for contrail formations.